I love how his defensive arguments are so little!

It really is great. He has all these rants/arguments in the initial essay. He gets death threats...bam, a page and a half of defending himself. If you dont like it, fine, just don't threaten his life anymore. Good man.
=)

Alright, I'm not trying to be offensive either. I truly think his comments were blown out of proportion. All of his allusions to Germany, his derogatory phrases, and the like, were very much needed. Maybe it's good to start an uproar. People will be mad, but IF they do start paying attention to the world around them, then perhaps they will remember his analogies.

I'm glad he supported himself with evidence in the response. That was much needed. In this sort of stream-of-conciousness rant, which is what he claims the first essay is, it would be difficult to back up and be thorough. He even mentions this fact at the end of it.

He was angry and we're all allowed to be angry. His response is more cool and less tempermental. I am glad it is not apologetic. I am glad it is short.